<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet killed the video star</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2006/10/20/291/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2006/10/20/291/</link>
	<description>Research Blog Masters of New Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:19:25 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Online Video Aesthetics - Short Essay &#171; Drs. R.D. Tol</title>
		<link>http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2006/10/20/291/comment-page-1/#comment-67468</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Video Aesthetics - Short Essay &#171; Drs. R.D. Tol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2006/10/20/291/#comment-67468</guid>
		<description>[...] site exceptionally attractive for early musicians. In previous posts on this blog (also here and here) I have written about the promotion function of YouTube and its role as conservator of artistic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] site exceptionally attractive for early musicians. In previous posts on this blog (also here and here) I have written about the promotion function of YouTube and its role as conservator of artistic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Masters of Media &#187; Video Vortex: Online Video Aesthetics - Short Essay</title>
		<link>http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2006/10/20/291/comment-page-1/#comment-67458</link>
		<dc:creator>Masters of Media &#187; Video Vortex: Online Video Aesthetics - Short Essay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2006/10/20/291/#comment-67458</guid>
		<description>[...] the site exceptionally attractive for early musicians. In previous posts on this blog (here and here) I have written about the promotion function of YouTube and its role as conservator of artistic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the site exceptionally attractive for early musicians. In previous posts on this blog (here and here) I have written about the promotion function of YouTube and its role as conservator of artistic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twan</title>
		<link>http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2006/10/20/291/comment-page-1/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>Twan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2006/10/20/291/#comment-610</guid>
		<description>Exactly :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roman.tol</title>
		<link>http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2006/10/20/291/comment-page-1/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>roman.tol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 21:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2006/10/20/291/#comment-607</guid>
		<description>Walter Benjamin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter Benjamin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twan</title>
		<link>http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2006/10/20/291/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Twan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2006/10/20/291/#comment-605</guid>
		<description>The Ok Go video is a very good example yeah, but one of the main issues with the Internet stars is: As soon as one idea is launched and is a success, thousands of others copy the idea (like the Ok Go video for example). So the &quot;idea-hypes&quot; are very short lived, and copied so many times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ok Go video is a very good example yeah, but one of the main issues with the Internet stars is: As soon as one idea is launched and is a success, thousands of others copy the idea (like the Ok Go video for example). So the &#8220;idea-hypes&#8221; are very short lived, and copied so many times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnneHelmond</title>
		<link>http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2006/10/20/291/comment-page-1/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>AnneHelmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2006/10/20/291/#comment-579</guid>
		<description>A bit of shameless self promotion: a few days ago I &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.annehelmond.nl/2006/10/18/alamo-race-track-cd-presentation/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;photographed Alamo Race Track&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; showcase for their new album, which is excellent.

But to comment on &quot;Internet killed the MTV music video star&quot; I think the opposite is true. The band &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NINJQ5LRh-0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Ok Go with their treadmill video&lt;/a&gt; received a lot of airplay on MTV and TMF due to their popular low budget video clip on YouTube. I think MTV is watching YouTube closely and they should.

And bands such as the Artic Monkeys became famous thanks to MySpace which hooked them up with record companies which are able to pay for their videoclips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit of shameless self promotion: a few days ago I <a href="http://www.annehelmond.nl/2006/10/18/alamo-race-track-cd-presentation/">photographed Alamo Race Track&#8217;s</a> showcase for their new album, which is excellent.</p>
<p>But to comment on &#8220;Internet killed the MTV music video star&#8221; I think the opposite is true. The band <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NINJQ5LRh-0"> Ok Go with their treadmill video</a> received a lot of airplay on MTV and TMF due to their popular low budget video clip on YouTube. I think MTV is watching YouTube closely and they should.</p>
<p>And bands such as the Artic Monkeys became famous thanks to MySpace which hooked them up with record companies which are able to pay for their videoclips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squires</title>
		<link>http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2006/10/20/291/comment-page-1/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>squires</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 02:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2006/10/20/291/#comment-573</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure how much this band actually thought about what they meant by &quot;Internet killed the video star,&quot; but my hunch is that it doesn&#039;t reference making &quot;music videos&quot; per se obsolete, but perhaps rather the existing structure of music videos being only shown via MTV, VH1, and whatever video &lt;b&gt;TV&lt;/b&gt; channels exist around the world for various locales.  And videos only being available for bands that are &quot;big&quot; enough (read: pretty enough, with good enough publicists, with catchy enough directorial styles) to be on those channels.

For me, Internet has killed the &lt;i&gt;TV star&lt;/i&gt;, and I think that&#039;s the case for many of the 20-35 cohort, at least people who use the internet socially or for any sort of media consumption.  This is anecdotal, but often when I&#039;m browsing MySpace profiles I see that on page after page, the line under &lt;b&gt;Interests&lt;/b&gt; for &lt;b&gt;Television&lt;/b&gt; has been completed with something like &quot;TV-free since 2003,&quot; &quot;TV makes you stupid,&quot; &quot;sucks,&quot; &quot;is what?&quot; &quot;turn off,&quot; etc.  I know a ton of people who don&#039;t have a TV in their household, or if they do, they only use it for watching movies.  I don&#039;t have any hard evidence to show that this is related to the abundance of similar content you can get online (after all, American TV really *does* suck, by and large), but I doubt they&#039;re unrelated.

So &lt;i&gt;Internet killed the MTV music video star&lt;/i&gt;, might have been more appropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how much this band actually thought about what they meant by &#8220;Internet killed the video star,&#8221; but my hunch is that it doesn&#8217;t reference making &#8220;music videos&#8221; per se obsolete, but perhaps rather the existing structure of music videos being only shown via MTV, VH1, and whatever video <b>TV</b> channels exist around the world for various locales.  And videos only being available for bands that are &#8220;big&#8221; enough (read: pretty enough, with good enough publicists, with catchy enough directorial styles) to be on those channels.</p>
<p>For me, Internet has killed the <i>TV star</i>, and I think that&#8217;s the case for many of the 20-35 cohort, at least people who use the internet socially or for any sort of media consumption.  This is anecdotal, but often when I&#8217;m browsing MySpace profiles I see that on page after page, the line under <b>Interests</b> for <b>Television</b> has been completed with something like &#8220;TV-free since 2003,&#8221; &#8220;TV makes you stupid,&#8221; &#8220;sucks,&#8221; &#8220;is what?&#8221; &#8220;turn off,&#8221; etc.  I know a ton of people who don&#8217;t have a TV in their household, or if they do, they only use it for watching movies.  I don&#8217;t have any hard evidence to show that this is related to the abundance of similar content you can get online (after all, American TV really *does* suck, by and large), but I doubt they&#8217;re unrelated.</p>
<p>So <i>Internet killed the MTV music video star</i>, might have been more appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

