Matthew Fuller: Search Engine Alternatives

On: November 15, 2009
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
About Chris Castiglione
Chris is an alumni of Universiteit van Amsterdam and the New Media M.A. Currently, he is the co-founder of One Month (www.onemonth.com), and the host of the On Books (www.on-books.com) podcast.

Website
http://www.castig.org    

Society of the QueryThe search market is a multi-billion dollar industry, and given such potential to capitalize there is a large window of opportunity with a vast range of possibilities for the future of search. The mythology of the search engine is that there is only one type of user and only one end-point for any given search. Matthew Fuller, author of a number of books on art, media and software, dismisses such narrow thinking by welcoming a cast of “alternative search engines” that offer some variety to the classic retrieval model of search.

In 1998 at Stanford University, Larry Page and Sergey Brin presented a paper that documented the structure of a “large-scale hypertextual web search engine” called “Google”. Fuller believes that Page and Brins’ paper is the backbone of all web searches and that within their methodology lies the foundation for other possibilities in the field of search. “If we understand the dynamics and conditions of what comprises a search engine, and if we think it through with a biological metaphor (as having an anatomy), then we can understand how search engines are induced to change ,” said Fuller.

Fuller went on to present a handful of alternative search engines that are augmenting search:

Viewzi

Viewzi's Timeline View

Viewzi provides a variety of different views for searching the web. As an example, Viewzi can present data on vector space where the most relevant data appears closer to the user and the least relevant data further away. In addition, it can Viewzi can then make connections between two different search queries, or it can arrange the items on a visual timeline. Fuller added, “Viewzi sets up multiple views and multiple structures that are different than what we are used to, very different from a flat list.”

oamos

Oamos's Search Results

Oamos is the search engine of saturation, entertainment and chaos. Fuller explained, “Rather than an analysis of discreet, rationally composed information, Oamos is about information as a search experience.”

kartoo

Kartoo's Search Results

Kartoo is a network visualization that reveals your search by mapping data within relationship similar data on the network.

There doesn’t only have to be “one slot to put your data”, “one button to press”, and “one way to return results.” What these examples show is a more multi-linear search which is different from the very flat, linear results given by Google. In conclusion Fuller affirmed, “Designing interfaces that match the potential for the Web’s complexity are underdeveloped, and this will be the challenge for the next wave of search.”

Society of the Query

One Response to “Matthew Fuller: Search Engine Alternatives”
  • November 23, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    When Fullen says that the backbone of all (new) search engines lies in the paper written by the two google founders this means that the forming of new search engines is limited. Since they always have to found some way to be different from Google while making using of the same basic principle. I wonder whether it wouldn’t be easier just to start from scratch.

Leave a Reply